OpEd – Bonita’s Comprehensive Plan / Raptor Bay (& Weeks too)

Submitted by Barbara Hinkson Craig, PhD

On February 3, the Bonita Springs city council may make an important decision regarding the future of the property at the end of Coconut Road by the Hyatt hotel.  The council will vote on a comprehensive plan amendment and a rezoning application that would allow  the developer WCI to rezone a portion of the land that is currently the Raptor Bay golf course . WCI wants to build four 22-story hi-rise towers on that land. 

Here is why I believe  the council should not adopt the comprehensive plan amendment.  

The amendment  proposes to change the current zoning for the Raptor Bay property from Outlying Suburban and Wetlands to Moderate Density mixed-Use/Planned Development.  This is  a major change in land use designation –from a golf course and open space use to towering high rises  To pass it through so quickly shows no thought of how this sort of proposed change will effect future decisions in a consistent manner which is a major requirement of a comprehensive plan.  

There are dozens of underperforming golf courses within the boundaries of Bonita Springs and there is absolutely no doubt that other such golf course property owners will be “knocking on the door” of the City Council and Zoning Board seeking similar changes to enable them to build where open space now exists. 

As with Raptor Bay Golf Course property, many of these other golf course properties were allowed and used as compensation for allowing higher density building in other parts of their development plan.  To now allow a change from the very sort of property that was to compensate for higher density without consideration of implications of such a change for this and other similarly situated properties flies in the face of the very reason for a comprehensive plan.   

A comprehensive plan is not something that is supposed to be adjusted willy-nilly in reaction to every knock on the door.  It is supposed to think ahead—5 years/10 years. Nor can a local governing body simply suspend the existing law on comprehensive plan amendment requirements just to “entice” a property to be annexed into its City boundaries as is the case here. 

 The transportation study accompanying this proposed plan amendment is inadequate, having been done off-season and by the developer which does not meet the requirements of the law, and it was not done in cooperation with the intergovernmental coordination elements of the law.

The environmental impact studies are similarly inadequate. In fact the city staff report noted this inadequacy by stating that more extensive studies will be done at time of issuing of building permits and were not required at this point. 

A comprehensive plan cannot be rationally based if environmental assessments are not done before changing a zoning designation from ”Outlaying Suburban and Wetlands,”  which is intended to provide an area that will protect the public interest of environmental, wetland, water purity, coastal surge protection and a whole host of other critical public interest environmental protections, to a zoning designation that would allow four giant 20 story over 2 floors of garage buildings to be built on what was heretofore considered critical open space wetlands area.

 To allow such a change without demanding that these critical studies be completed first would be to make the Comprehensive Plan law meaningless. The Bonita City Council should not adopt this amendment, and I urge the public to voice their concerns as well.

Barbara Hinkson Craig, PhD

Professor Emerita, Wesleyan University

3 thoughts on “OpEd – Bonita’s Comprehensive Plan / Raptor Bay (& Weeks too)

  1. The entire skyline of the area will be ruined, both for the residents of pelican landing and the rest of the neighborhood.

  2. I am concerned that Bonita Springs will focus only on the affect of this change outside of Pelican Landing e.g., roads and traffic etc., and ignore the negative affect on the existing residents property rights e.g., Dilution of Amenities as more residents are added that can use Amenities that are already operating at capacity. Residents that vote in Bonita Springs should express their objections to the Bonita Springs Council.

    • Let me assure you that RBC has its eye focused clearly on these inside our gate effects but we need to fight that battle as part of our challenge to this way late supposedly “voluntary” turnover. Our inside our gate concerns are not likely to resonate or be pertinent to the City Council though they clearly should be to our council member in his vote. Barb Craig

Comments are closed.